Small technical points such as this frequently bewilder the beginning student but are seldom explained in textbooks on clinical MR imaging. Indeed, both types of 180° flipping are possible; which type of flip occurs in a given situation depends on the phase of the transmitted RF pulse.
Recall that an "RF pulse" is merely a magnetic field (B1) of short duration rotating at the Larmor frequency in the transverse plane. Depending on its phase, B1 may be considered to be "directed" along the x-axis or y-axis (or anywhere else in between). The above illustration shows the different refocusing directions produced by 180°-pulses along different axes.
Recall that an "RF pulse" is merely a magnetic field (B1) of short duration rotating at the Larmor frequency in the transverse plane. Depending on its phase, B1 may be considered to be "directed" along the x-axis or y-axis (or anywhere else in between). The above illustration shows the different refocusing directions produced by 180°-pulses along different axes.
By adjusting the phase of transmission, the 180° pulse may be applied along the x-axis, y-axis, or any other direction. On the left side of the diagram is a 180y° pulse, that is, one that rotates the spins around the y-axis. The echo forms in the +y-direction. On the right is a 180x° pulse that causes the echo to form along the −y-direction. |
In the early SE experiments by Hahn (1950) and Carr and Purcell (1954), RF pulses were all applied along the same axis (usually x-direction). In practice, this method resulted in measured T2 values that were too short because of (1) cumulative phase errors from repetitive imperfect 180° pulses, and (2) B1 inhomogeneity effects that spread the magnetization out in a plane containing B1 and Bo. In 1958 Meiboom and Gill proposed that such pulse-related errors could be reduced if the 180°-pulses in a SE train were phase shifted 90° with respect to the initial 90° pulse. In other words, if the 90°-pulse were applied along the x-axis, the 180°-pulses would be applied alternately along the ±y-axes. This technique, subsequently known by the acronym CPMG (Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill), was extremely robust and is still employed on modern MR imagers when the SE technique is selected.
Advanced Discussion (show/hide)»
No supplementary material yet. Check back soon.
References
Carr HY, Purcell EM. Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 1954;94:630-8.
Hahn EL. Spin echoes. Phys Rev 1950;80:580-594.
Meiboom S, Gill D. Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 1958; 29:688-691.
Carr HY, Purcell EM. Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 1954;94:630-8.
Hahn EL. Spin echoes. Phys Rev 1950;80:580-594.
Meiboom S, Gill D. Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 1958; 29:688-691.