The simplest way to eliminate the phase wrap-around artifact is to increase the phase field-of-view (FOV) to encompass the entire anatomic dimension of the subject in that direction. This solution is illustrated below showing how wrap-around is progressively eliminated as the phase FOV is increased from 15 cm to 20 cm to 30 cm.
This method cannot be exercised with impunity, however, for if the FOV is increased, spatial resolution will suffer. To maintain spatial resolution, therefore, the number of phase-encoding steps must be increased. Phase wrap-around will be eliminated, but at the cost of increased imaging time.
As an alternative strategy, the frequency- and phase-encoding axes may be swapped so that the shorter dimension of the subject is oriented in the phase-encode direction. If the field-of-view is very small, however, even the shorter anatomic dimension of the subject may still exceed the field-of-view, and phase wrap-around will still occur. Additionally, switching phase and frequency may introduce different unwanted artifacts over the image (such as motion-induced phase ghosts or chemical-shift artifacts), thus limiting the usefulness of this simple strategy.
Another group of techniques eliminates phase wrap-around by minimizing the signal from the tissue outside the field-of-view. These techniques include using a surface coil (which doesn't detect signals far away from it) and applying saturation pulses outside the field-of-view (to eliminate the signal from tissues there).
Finally, "phase oversampling" or "no-phase-wrap" techniques are available that largely eliminate the phase wrap-around artifact in most cases. These techniques are the subject of the next Q&A.
Another group of techniques eliminates phase wrap-around by minimizing the signal from the tissue outside the field-of-view. These techniques include using a surface coil (which doesn't detect signals far away from it) and applying saturation pulses outside the field-of-view (to eliminate the signal from tissues there).
Finally, "phase oversampling" or "no-phase-wrap" techniques are available that largely eliminate the phase wrap-around artifact in most cases. These techniques are the subject of the next Q&A.
Advanced Discussion (show/hide)»
No supplementary material yet. Check back soon!
References
Axel L, Morton D. Correction of phase wrapping in magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 1989;16:284-287.
Heiland S. From A as in aliasing to Z as in zipper: artifacts in MRI. Clin Neuroradiol 2008; 1:25-36.
Pusey E, Yoon C, Anselmo ML, Lufkin RB. Aliasing artifacts in MR imaging. Comput Med Imag Graphics 1988;12:219-224.
Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. Radiographics 2006;26:275-297.
Axel L, Morton D. Correction of phase wrapping in magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 1989;16:284-287.
Heiland S. From A as in aliasing to Z as in zipper: artifacts in MRI. Clin Neuroradiol 2008; 1:25-36.
Pusey E, Yoon C, Anselmo ML, Lufkin RB. Aliasing artifacts in MR imaging. Comput Med Imag Graphics 1988;12:219-224.
Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. Radiographics 2006;26:275-297.
Related Questions
Why does the phase wrap-around artifact occur?
Why does the phase wrap-around artifact occur?